Leadership -- by title vs choice?

Is leadership associated with a title or is it one that is a choice and irrespective of title?   Can great leadership be taught?

Think about some of the opportunities when you've been in a leadership position before.  You were promoted or volunteered -- or voluntold! to take a position with a title.  That leadership title often has a job description outlined and clear expectations. Those you often interact with in positions above and below you have a clear picture of what you're responsible for based on your title.  The title comes sometimes whether you're ready or not.  When you lose your title or give it up, that responsibility is done.  It passes on to someone else.

On the other hand, great leadership is a choice. It happens without a specific title. Those great leaders interact with see leadership in action and see the impact of what they do without having a specific title and job description laid out.

Every interaction, good or bad, is an opportunity to learn more about leadership. Though the concept and theory can be taught, the individual style is harder.  Like ballroom dancing, it's difficult to teach someone the finer points of how to lead, when to subtly give one's partner pressure to move one direction or another, when to give them space to move on their own.  But good dancers have watched, learned and found their own rhythm for how best to lead across a wide variety of dance partners.

Great leadership continues with or without a title. Watch the great leaders you're around. How do they do it?
http://www.learn.eaglesflight.com/blog/bid/133325/Is-Leadership-a-Choice